Update:  On July 14, 2014, Duke filed a memo contra to the joint motion of OMA, Kroger, OCC, and Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy (OPAE) to reject Duke’s May 29, 2014 application.  Duke argues that its application was sufficient and that if the Commission finds it to be insufficient, the remedy is not to reject the entire application.  Duke argues that it should be allowed to supplement its application should the Commission find any deficiencies.  OMA, Kroger, OCC, and OPAE filed a reply in support of their motion on July 17, 2014.

On July 15, 2014, the OCC filed a memo contra to Duke’s motion for a protective order regarding the confidentiality/protective agreement dispute between OCC and Duke.  Duke filed a reply to the memorandum contra on July 17, 2014.

To date, OEG’s previously-filed motion requesting that the Commission establish a protective agreement has been fully briefed, but has not been ruled upon.