Update: On May 4, 2015, OMA, Duke, and numerous other parties filed applications for rehearing of the Commission’s April 2, 2015 Order. Among those arguments asserted by OMA were that the Commission erred in establishing the Price Stabilization Rider, the Commission erred in permitting Duke to recover $169 million through the Distribution Capital Investment Rider (Rider DCI) over the course of the ESP, and the Commission erred when it determined that the proposed ESP is more favorable in the aggregate than a market rate offer.