Update: In August, the PUCO issued its Eighth Entry on Rehearing denying FE and others’ applications for rehearing. FE filed an application for rehearing challenging the PUCO’s directive to use a monitor/auditor to assist Staff to ensure that FE spends Rider DMR funds appropriately and the removal of a 50 basis point adder. The PUCO already considered FE’s arguments in prior applications for rehearing and rejected them. FE now erroneously asserts these issues a second time in an attempt to stall OMAEG and others’ right to appeal the PUCO’s Eighth Entry on Rehearing to the Supreme Court of Ohio while it continues to collect unlawful charges from its customers. OMAEG intends to oppose FE’s application for rehearing and assert its right to appeal the PUCO’s Opinion and Order and subsequent entries on rehearing in this case.